Clinical and radiologic comparison between oblique lateral interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To compare the short-term clinical efficacy and radiologic differences between oblique lateral interbody fusion(OLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.@*METHODS@#A retrospective analysis was performed on 58 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis treated with OLIF or MIS-TLIF from April 2019 to October 2020. Among them, 28 patients were treated with OLIF (OLIF group), including 15 males and 13 females aged 47 to 84 years old with an average age of (63.00±9.38) years. The other 30 patients were treated with MIS-TLIF(MIS-TLIF group), including 17 males and 13 females aged 43 to 78 years old with an average age of (61.13±11.10) years. General conditions, including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, complications, lying in bed, and hospitalization time were recorded in both groups. Radiological characteristics, including intervertebral disc height (DH), intervertebral foramen height (FH), and lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), were compared between two groups. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate the clinical effect.@*RESULTS@#The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, lying in bed, and hospitalization time in OLIF group were significantly less than those in the MIS-TLIF group (P<0.05). The intervertebral disc height and intervertebral foramen height were significantly improved in both groups after the operation (P<0.05). The lumbar lordosis angle in OLIF group was significantly improved compared to before the operation(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the MIS-TLIF group before and after operation(P>0.05). Postoperative intervertebral disc height, intervertebral foramen height, and lumbar lordosis were better in the OLIF group than in the MIS-TLIF group (P<0.05). The VAS and ODI of the OLIF group were lower than those of the MIS-TLIF group within 1 week and 1 month after the operation (P<0.05), and there were no significant differences in VAS and ODI at 3 and 6 months after the operation between the two groups(P>0.05). In the OLIF group, 1 case had paresthesia of the left lower extremity with flexion-hip weakness and 1 case had a collapse of the endplate after the operation;in the MIS-TLIF group, 2 cases had radiation pain of lower extremities after decompression.@*CONCLUSION@#Compared with MIS-TLIF, OLIF results in less operative trauma, faster recovery, and better imaging performance after lumbar spine surgery.

Analysis of the causes and clinical results of vertebral fracture during oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To analyze the causes of vertebral fracture during oblique lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylopathy, summarize the clinical results, and propose preventive measures.@*METHODS@#Retrospective analysis was made on the data of 8 cases of lumbar spondylopathy and vertebral fracture treated by oblique lateral interbody fusion in three medical centers from October 2014 to December 2018. All were female, aged from 50 to 81 years with an average of 66.4 years. Disease types included 1 case of lumbar degenerative disease, 3 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis, 2 cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and 2 cases of lumbar degenerative scoliosis. Preoperative dual energy X-ray bone mineral density test showed that 2 cases had T-value >-1 SD, 2 cases had T-value -1 to -2.5 SD, and 4 cases had T-value <-2.5 SD. Single segment fusion was in 5 cases, two segment fusion in 1 case and three segment fusion in 2 cases. Four cases were treated with OLIF Stand-alone and 4 cases were treated with OLIF combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation. Postoperative imaging examination showed vertebral fracture, and all of them were single vertebral fracture. There were 2 cases of right lower edge fracture of upper vertebral body at fusion segment, 6 cases of lower vertebral body fracture at fusion segment, and 6 cases with endplate injury and fusion cage partially embedded in vertebral body. Three cases of OLIF Stand-alone were treated with pedicle screw fixation via posterior intermuscular approach, while one case of OLIF Stand-alone and four cases of OLIF combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation were not treated specially.@*RESULTS@#The 5 cases of initial operation and 3 cases of reoperation did not show wound skin necrosis or wound infection. The follow-up time was from 12 to 48 months with an average of 22.8 months. Visual analogue scale (VAS) of low back pain was preoperative decreased from 4 to 8 points (averagely 6.3 points) and postoperative 1 to 3 points (averagely 1.7 points) at the final follow-up. Oswestry disability index (ODI) was preoperative 39.7% to 52.4% (averagely 40.2%), and postoperative 7.9% to 11.2% (averagely 9.5%) at the final follow-up. During the follow-up, there was no loosening or fracture of the pedicle screw system, and no lateral displacement of the fusion cage;however, the fusion cage at the vertebral fracture segment had obvious subsidence. The intervertebral space height of vertebral fracture segment was preoperaive 6.7 to 9.2 mm (averagely 8.1 mm), and postoperative 10.5 to 12.8 mm (averagely 11.2 mm). The improvement rate after operation was 37.98% compared to preoperative. The intervertebral space height at final follow-up was 8.4 to 10.9 mm (averagely 9.3 mm), and the loss rate was 16.71% compared with that after operation. At the final follow-up, interbody fusion was achieved in all cases except for one that could not be identified.@*CONCLUSION@#The incidence of vertebral fracture during oblique lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylopathy is lower, and there are many reasons for fracture, including preoperative bone loss or osteoporosis, endplate injury, irregular shape of endplate, excessive selection of fusion cage, and osteophyte hyperplasia at the affected segment. As long as vertebral fracture is found in time and handled properly, the prognosis is well. However, it still needs to strengthen prevention.

Treatment strategy on traumatic mid-lumbar spondyloptosis with concomitant multiple injuries: A case report and literature review / 中华创伤杂志(英文版)

Spondyloptosis in the clinic is rarely reported. We herein present a 47-year-old female, who suffered from a crush injury directly by a heavy cylindrical object from the lateral side. She was diagnosed to have traumatic L3 spondyloptosis with multiple traumas. Staged surgical procedures were conducted and a three-year follow-up was obtained. Eventually, normal spinal alignment was restored, and neurological deficits were gradually improved. At three years follow-up, the motor strength scores and function of the sphincters were incompletely improved. Previously published reports on traumatic lumbar spondyloptosis were reviewed and several critical points for management of this severe type of spinal injury were proposed. First, thoracolumbar and lumbosacral junction were mostly predilection sites. Second, numerous patients involving traumatic lumbar spondyloptosis were achieved to American Spinal Injury Association grade A. Third, lumbar spondyloptosis was commonly coupling with cauda equina injury. Finally, the outcomes were still with poorly prognosis and recovery of patients was correlation to spondyloptosis severity. Based on this case report and literatures review, we highlighted that the spinal alignment restoration relying on staged operations and following rehabilitation hereof are both important once facing with multiple traumas. Furthermore, we suggested to perform routine CT angiography during lumbar spondyloptosis to justify whether there are large vessel compression or injury.

Treatment of stable degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with percutaneous endoscopic surgery through two different approaches / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To assess the clinical effects of percutaneous endoscopic surgery through two different approaches for stable degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.@*METHODS@#Sixty-four patients with stable degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent percutaneous endoscopic procedures between January 2016 and December 2019 were divided into transforaminal approach group and interlaminar approach group according to surgical approaches, 32 patients in each group. There were 16 males and 16 females in transforaminal approach group, aged from 52 to 84 years old with an average of (66.03±9.60) years, L2 slippage in 4 cases, L3 slippage in 5, and L4 slippage in 23. There were 17 males and 15 females in interlaminar approach group, aged from 46 to 81 years old with an average of (61.38±9.88) years, L3 slippage in 3 cases, L4 slippage in 15, and L5 slippage in 14. Operative time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and postoperative bedtime were compared between two groups. Anteroposterior displacement values, interbody opening angles, and the percentage of slippage were measured on preoperative and postoperative 12-month dynamic radiographs. Visual analogue scale (VAS) of low back pain and lower extremity pain, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score before and after surgery were observed, and clinical effects were evaluated according to the modified MACNAB criteria.@*RESULTS@#All operations were successfully completed, and patients in both groups were followed up for more than 1 year, and without complications during follow-up period. ①There was no significant difference in operation time between two groups(P>0.05). Intraoperative fluoroscopy times were longer in transforaminal approach group than that in intervertebral approach group(P<0.05). Postoperative bedtime was shorter in transforaminal approach group than that in intervertebral approach group (P<0.05).② No lumbar instability was found on dynamic radiography at 12 months postoperatively in both groups. There were no significant differences in anteroposterior displacement values, interbody opening angles, and the percentage of slippage between two groups postoperative 12 months and preoperative 1 day(P>0.05). ③There was no significant difference between two groups in VAS of low back pain at 3 days and 1, 12 months after the operation compared with the preoperative(P>0.05), but the VAS of the lower extremity pain was significantly improved compared with the preoperative(P<0.05). Both of groups showed significant improvement in JOA score at 12 months compared with preoperatively(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS of low back pain, lower extremity pain and JOA scores between two groups during the same period after surgery(P>0.05). According to modified Macnab criteria, excellent, good, fair and poor outcomes were 21, 7, 3 and 1 in transforaminal approach group respectively, and which in intervertebral approach group were 20, 7, 5 and 0, there was no significant difference in clinical effect between the groups(P>0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#Intervertebral approach may reduce intraoperative fluoroscopy times and transforaminal approach can shorten postoperative bedtime, both approaches achieve satisfactory results in the treatment of stable degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with no progression of short-term slippage.

Development and clinical application of a new transverse process retractor based on computer-aided design and 3D printing technology / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To manufacture a new type of transverse process retractor by using computer-aided design(CAD) combined with 3D printing technology and investigate its clinical application effect.@*METHODS@#A new type of transverse protrusion retractor was developed by CAD combined with 3D printing technology. From September 2018 to September 2019, the new transverse process retractor was applied in clinic. Sixty patients with lumbar single segment lesions who needed treatment by pedicle screw fixation, bone grafting and interbody fusion were divided into new transverse process retractor group and control group, with 30 cases in each group. There were 14 males and 16 females in new type transverse process retractor group, the age was (68.0±4.3) years old on average; lesion segment of 8 cases were L3,4, 9 cases were L4,5, 13 cases were L5S1;5 cases of lumbar disc herniation, 20 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis, 5 cases of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis;new transverse process retractor was used to pedicle screw placement. While there were 15 males and 15 females in control group, with an average age of (69.2±4.5) years old;lesion segment of 8 cases were L3,4, 10 cases were L4,5, 12 cases were L5S1;5 cases of lumbar disc herniation, 21 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis, 4 cases of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis;the traditional lamina retractor was used for soft tissue pulling and finished pedicle screw placement by freehand. The length of surgical incision, the time required for inserting a single screw, fluoroscopy times, the times of adjusting the positioning needle or screw in insertion process, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of surgical incision 72 hours after operation were compared between two groups.@*RESULTS@#Using CAD and 3D printing technology, a new type of transverse protrusion retractor was developed quickly. The length of surgical incision, the time required for inserting a single screw, fluoroscopy time, and the times of adjusting the positioning needle or screw in insertion process in new transverse process retractor group were less than those in control group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS of lumbar incision pain at 72 hours after operation between two groups(P>0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#Using CAD combined with 3D printing technology to develop a new transverse protrusion retractor has the advantages of convenient design, short development cycle and low cost. It provides a new idea for the research and development of new medical devices. The new transverse process retractor has the advantages of easy operation, reliable fixation, less damage to paravertebral muscle, convenient pedicle screw placement, reducing fluoroscopy time and so on.

Two different techniques combined with MIS-TLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis:a case-control study / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To analyze the difference in clinical efficacy of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) under Quadrant channel system combined with microscope and percutaneous pedicle screw in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.@*METHODS@#A total of 114 patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis from June 2015 to February 2019, were divided into three groups according to the surgical methods, such as the MIS-TLIF under the microscope surgery group ( microscope group), MIS-TLIF combined with percutaneous pedicle screw technique surgery group(percutaneous group) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery group (open group). In the microscope group, there were 12 males and 26 females, aged from 42 to 83 years with an average of (63.29±9.09) years. In the percutaneous group, there were 16 males and 22 females, aged from 45 to 82 years with an average of (63.37±7.50) years. In the open group, there were 12 males and 26 females, aged from 51 to 82 years with an average of (63.76±8.21) years. The general conditions of operation, such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, length of surgical incision, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative time of lying in bed were recorded to analyze the differences in surgical related indicators. Visual analogue scale (VAS) of waist and leg pain in preoperative and postoperative period (3 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months) were recorded to evaluate pain remission;Oswestry Disability Index(ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were recorded to evaluate the recovery of waist and leg function on preoperative and postoperative 12 months. The lumbar spondylolisthesis rate and intervertebral height at 12 months after operation were recorded to evaluate the reduction of spondylolisthesis. The Siepe intervertebral fusion standard was used to analyze the intervertebral fusion rate at 12 months after operation.@*RESULTS@#①All 114 patients were followed up more than 1 year, and no complications related to incision infection occurred. In the microscope group, there was 1 case of subcutaneous effusion 8 days after operation. After percutaneous puncture and drainage, waist compression, and then the healing was delayed. In the percutaneous group, 2 cases of paravertebral muscle necrosis occurred on the side of decompression, and the healing was delayed after debridement. In open group, there was 1 case of intraoperative dural tear, which was packed with free adipose tissue during the operation. There was no postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage and other related complications.① Compared with microscope group, percutaneous group increased in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative wound drainage, surgical incision length, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and postoperative bed rest time. In open group, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative wound drainage, surgical incision length, and postoperative bed rest time increased, but the intraoperative fluoroscopy time decreased. Compared with percutaneous group, the intraoperative blood loss, wound drainage, surgical incision length, and postoperative bed rest time in open group increased, but operative time and the intraoperative fluoroscopy time decreased(P<0.05). ②ODI and JOA scores of the three groups at 12 months after operation were improved compared with those before operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the three group(P>0.05). ③Compared with microscope group, the VAS of low back pain in percutaneous group increased at 3 days after operation, and VAS of low back pain in open group increased at 3 days, and 12 month after operation. Compared with percutaneous group, the VAS low back pain score of the open group increased at 3 months after operation (P<0.05). ④ The lumbar spondylolisthesis rate of the three groups of patients at 12 months afrer operation was decreased compared with that before operation(P<0.05), and the intervertebral heigh was increased compared with that before operation(P<0.05), however, there was no significant difference among three groups at 12 months afrer operation(P>0.05). ⑤ There was no significant difference between three groups in the lumbar fusion rate at 12 months afrer operation(P>0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#The MIS-TLIF assisted by microscope and the MIS-TLIF combined with percutaneous pedicle screw are safe and effective to treat the degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with single-segment, and the MIS-TLIF assisted by microscope may be more invasive, cause less blood loss and achieve better clinical efficacy.

Analysis of early and middle stage efficacy and complications of oblique lumbar interbody fusion in treating degenerative lumbar diseases / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the early and middle stage efficacy and complications of minimally invasive extraperitoneal oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.@*METHODS@#The clinical data of 22 patients with degenerative lumbar diseases underwent OLIF from October 2017 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 14 males and 8 females, aged from 51 to 72 years with an average of (63.15±7.22) years. There were 6 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis, 5 cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis, 4 cases of adjacent vertebral disease, 3 cases of degenerative lumbar scoliosis, 3 cases of discogenic low back pain, and 1 case of recurrence after posterior lumbar decompression. Posterior minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation was performed in 13 cases and Stand-alone fixation in 9 cases. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative drainage volume, landing time were recorded. The intervertebral disc height(IDH), intervertebral foramen height(IFH), intervertebral foramen area( IFA), canal diameter(CD), canal area(CA) were measured before and after operation. The imaging changes (including location of fusion cage, interbody fusion, and cage subsidence) and complications were observed. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numerical rating scales (NRS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were compared before and 3, 6, 12 months after operation.@*RESULTS@#All 22 patients successfully completed the operation. The intraoperative blood loss was 25 to 280 ml with an average of (95.45±79.07) ml and that of simple anterior approach was 25 to 70 ml with an average of (45.71±15.42) ml. The operation time was 75 to 210 min with an average of (137.72±37.66) min, and the simple anterior operation time was 75 to 105 min with an average of (91.40±15.96) min. The total drainage volume was 10 to 110 ml with an average of (56.23±31.15) ml, and the time to go down to the ground was 24 to 72 hours (54.48±18.24) hours after operation. Postoperative IDH improved (6.63±2.61)mm(P<0.05), the IFH improved (5.35±2.47)mm (P<0.05), the IFA improved (97.67±33.58)mm2(P<0.05), the CD improved (3.31±1.61) mm(P<0.05), the CA improved (57.52±31.39) mm2(P<0.05). Five patients got interbody fusion at 6 months after operation and all 22 patients got interbody fusion at 12 months after operation. There was 5 cases of fusion cage subsidence, all of which occurred in the cases without posterior fixation(using Stand-alone fixation). There was no serious complication such as big blood vessel injury, ureter injury, dural sac injury and nerve root injury. Peritoneal injury occurred in 1 case, postoperative transient thigh pain, decrease of quadriceps femoris muscle strength in 4 cases and sympathetic nerve injury in 1 case. The symptoms of lumbago and radicular pain of lower extremities were alleviated obviously 3 days after operation. The ODI, NRS and JOA scores at 6, 12 months after operation were significantly improved(P<0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#The treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases with definite indications by OLIF can achieve satisfactory clinical results, and it has advantages of less intraoperative bleeding, fast time to land, less complications, good imaging improvement and indirect decompression. But the operation time and fluoroscopy time are longer in the early stage, and complications such as peritoneal injury and lumbar plexus over traction may occur. The long-term incidence of settlement of fusion cage with Stand-alone technology is higher.

Treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by microscope-assisted Zista channel / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the clinical efficacy and advantage of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under microscope-assisted Zista channel in the treatment of degreeⅠandⅡdegenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.@*METHODS@#The clinical data of 18 patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis treated by microscope-assisted Zista channel MIS-TLIF operation from January 2017 to March 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 10 males and 8 females with an average age of 59 years (48 to 70). The course of spondylolisthesis ranged from 6 months to 5 years with an average of 33 months. The segment of spondylolisthesis was L@*RESULTS@#All the patients completed the operation successfully and were followed up more than 12 months after operation. Operation time was(160.45±34.98) min, intraoperative blood loss was (88.32±21.12) ml, postoperative drainage volume was (50.34 ±18.22)ml, and walking time after operation was (20.65±6.25) h. Preoperative and postoperative at 7 days, 3 months, 12 months, VAS score of low back pain was 7.81±2.16, 4.19±1.17, 2.25±0.62 and 1.53±0.58 respectively, VAS score of leg pain was 8.47± 2.21, 3.45±0.86, 2.31±0.73 and 1.43±0.47, JOA score was 12.01±2.33, 18.56±3.12, 23.54±3.31 and 26.34±2.65. There were significant differences in VAS and JOA scores between preoperative and postoperative (@*CONCLUSION@#MIS-TLIF under microscope-assisted Zista channel has obvious minimally invasive advantages in the treatment of degreeⅠandⅡdegenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, and it is a safe and effective method.

Espondiloptosis traumática C7-T1 sin compromiso neurológico / Traumatic spondyloptosis C7-T1 without neurologic deficit

Resumen: La espondiloptosis traumática es una lesión muy rara y grave generalmente causada por traumatismos de alta energía. Consiste en la dislocación anterior o posterior de 100% o más al cuerpo vertebral subyacente, lo que puede generar compresión y lesión total de la médula espinal, produciendo déficit neurológico; este tipo de lesión representa la etapa 4 y 5 de Allen. Caso clínico: Masculino de 50 años quien sufre accidente automovilístico al colisionar contra muro de contención, generándose lesión de tipo hiperextensión-compresión cervicotorácica, manejado con hemicorpectomía C7, discectomía C7-T1, espondilodesis con placa anterior (C6-C7, C7-T1), toma y aplicación de injerto, abordaje posterior + fascetectomías de C7 + fijación transfacetaria C6 y transpedicular de T1. Discusión: Encontramos que la estabilización temprana con pinza de Gardner más el abordaje anterior y posterior brindan adecuados resultados en cuanto a integridad sensitiva y motora del paciente así como una pronta rehabilitación.

Abstract: Traumatic spondyloptosis is a serious injury usually caused by high-energy trauma; It consists of the anterior or posterior dislocation of 100% or more of the underlying vertebral body, which can become a total injury of the spinal cord, producing a neurological deficit; this type of injury represents stage 4 and 5 of Allen-Ferguson. Clinical case: A 50-year-old man who suffers a car accident, he receive frontal impact when he was a driver, colliding with the retaining wall, referred from another hospital to emergency room, managed with C7 hemicorpectomy, c7-t1 discectomy, spondylodesis with anterior plate (C6-T1), and posterior approach + Fascetectomies of C7-T1, facet joint screws C6 and transpedicular fixation of T1. Discussion: Subaxial cervical spondyloptosis is relatively rare clinical entity, a complete clinical examination is important in diagnosis, taking in considerations the injury mechanism. For treatment we have a multiple options, at this case anterior-posterior (360 degrees) treatment it was the better option for Us; however, must be personalized and consider the early rehabilitation of patient.

Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis II: treatment and controversies / Espondilolistesis degenerativa lumbar II: tratamiento y controversias

Abstract: There are various approaches and surgical techniques with the objective of nerve root decompression, restrict mobility, and fusion of the listhesis. Among the techniques, posterior interbody fusion combines direct and indirect root decompression with the fusion between vertebral bodies, placing an autologous bone graft between transverse apophysis and vertebral bodies. Transforaminal lumbar and posterior interbody fusion, on the same way, look to decompress and fuse but with a different approach to the spine. The anterior approach for interbody fusion provides a better fusion rate. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion is considered less invasive, with an anterolateral transpsoas approach. The lumbar fusion technique in degenerative spondylolisthesis must be individualized. Non-fusion decompression is considered a less invasive procedure. Various studies suggest that decompression has better results when fusion is added. Surgery had several potential benefits and greater improvement in those patients who fail conservative management. An optimal technique is not conclusively identified.

Resumen: El tratamiento de la espondilolistesis degenerativa lumbar es específico para cada etapa de la enfermedad y el manejo quirúrgico no debe de ser la primera elección en la mayoría de los casos. El manejo conservador está basado en el uso de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos, control de peso y rehabilitación. En caso de falla después de cuatro a seis semanas, el siguiente paso es la infiltración facetaria. En caso de dolor persistente, alteraciones neurológicas o claudicación neurogénica el siguiente paso es la cirugía. Existen varios abordajes y técnicas quirúrgicas con el objetivo de descomprimir las raíces nerviosas, restringir la movilidad y fusionar la listesis. Entre las técnicas quirúrgicas, la fusión posterior combina la descompresión directa e indirecta con artrodesis entre los cuerpos vertebrales, colocando injerto entre las apófisis transversas y los cuerpos vertebrales. La artrodesis intersomática transforaminal y posterior buscan de la misma manera la descompresión y fusión, pero con un abordaje distinto. El abordaje anterior para artrodesis intersomática provee la mejor tasa de fusión. La artrodesis intersomática lateral se considera un procedimiento menos invasivo, con un abordaje anterolateral transpsoas. La técnica de artrodesis lumbar en la espondilolistesis debe ser individualizada. La descompresión sin artrodesis se considera un procedimiento menos invasivo; varios estudios sugieren que la descompresión tiene mejores resultados cuando se agrega una artrodesis. La cirugía tiene múltiples beneficios posibles en pacientes en quienes el tratamiento conservador ha fallado. No se ha identificado una técnica óptima de tratamiento.

Fusión cervical anterior C2-C3 para espondilolistesis traumática del axis grado III / Anterior C2-C3 Cervical Fusion for Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Axis Grade III

RESUMEN Se trata de un paciente masculino de 85 años de edad, que sufrió una caída y fue inmovilizado y trasladado al servicio de urgencia; refería dolor cervical y rigidez del cuello. Al examen neurológico no se constata déficit neurológico, salvo la contractura de la musculatura cervical. Se le diagnosticó espondilolistesis traumática del axis grado III confirmada mediante estudios radiográficos. Se le realizó abordaje anterior retrofaríngeo extendido con fijación con láminas y tornillos C2-3. El paciente utilizó ortesis rígida externa durante 4 semanas. Su evolución fue favorable(AU)

ABSTRACT This is an 85-year-old male patient who fell and was immobilized and transferred to the emergency department. He complained of neck pain and neck stiffness. Neurological examination revealed no neurological deficit, except for the contracture of the cervical musculature. Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis grade III confirmed by radiographic studies was diagnosed. An extended anterior retropharyngeal approach was performed with fixation with blades and C2-3 screws. The patient wore a rigid external orthosis for 4 weeks. His evolution was favorable(AU)

Posterior L5-S1 transdiscal screws for high grade spondylolisthesis - a systematic review

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The surgical management of high-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis (HGLS) is complex and aims to achieve both a solid fusion that is able to support the high shear forces of the lumbosacral junction, as well as neural decompression. We performed a systematic literature review of the safety and efficacy of posterior transdiscal (PTD) screw fixation from L5S1 for HGLS and its variations. METHODS: A systematic literature review following the PRISMA guidelines was performed in the PubMed database of the studies describing the use of PTD screw fixation for HGLS. Clinical and radiological data were extracted and discussed. Study quality was assessed with the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. RESULTS: Seven studies were included and reviewed; all of them were level IV of evidence. Two of them had large case series comparing different surgical techniques: one concluded that PTD was associated with better clinical outcomes when compared with standard screw fixation techniques and the other suggesting that the clinical and radiological outcomes of PTD were similar to those when an interbody fusion (TLIF) technique was performed, but PTD was technically less challenging. The remaining five studies included small case series and case reports. All of them reported the successful useful of PTD with or without technical variations. CONCLUSIONS: Our review concludes, with limited level of evidence that PTD fixation is a safe and efficient technique for treating HGLS patients. It is technically less demanding than a circumferential fusion, even though proper screw insertion is more demanding than conventional pedicle screw fixation.

RESUMO OBJETIVOS: O tratamento cirúrgico das listeses de alto grau da coluna lombar (LAGCL) é complexo, objetivando alcançar uma fusão sólida capaz de suportar o estresse biomecânico da junção lombo-sacra, bem como descompressão do tecido neural. Realizamos revisão sistemática da literatura para avaliar a segurança e a eficácia da fixação transdiscal (FTD) L5S1 em LAGCL e suas variações. MÉTODOS: Realizamos revisão sistemática conforme metodologia Prisma na base de dados PubMed dos estudos que utilizaram FTD no tratamento das LAGCL e suas variações. Dados clínicos e radiológicos foram extraídos dos trabalhos e discutidos. A qualidade dos estudos foi avaliada segundo o Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. RESULTADOS: Sete estudos foram incluídos e analisados, todos com nível IV de evidência. Dois estudos tinham séries de casos maiores, comparando diferentes técnicas cirúrgicas: um concluiu que a FTD foi associada a melhor prognóstico clínico quando comparada à fixação pedicular tradicional, e o outro sugeriu que os resultados clínicos e radiológicos com a FTD foram semelhantes à fusão intersomática, porém com menor demanda técnica na FTD. Os demais cinco estudos eram pequenas séries ou relatos de casos. Todos reportaram o uso da FTD com sucesso, com e sem variações da técnica. CONCLUSÃO: Concluímos que, embora com evidências limitadas, a FTD é segura e efetiva no tratamento das LAGCL. É tecnicamente mais simples do que a fusão circunferencial (intersomática), porém com maior complexidade que a fixação pedicular convencional.

Epidemiological and radiological profile of patients with degenerative scoliosis: 20 year experience at a referral institute / Perfil epidemiológico y radiológico de pacientes con escoliosis degenerativa: 20 años de experiencia en un Instituto de referencia

Abstract: Background: Adult degenerative scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional rotational deformity, in a previously straight spine, resulting in sagittal and axial disbalance. Material and methods: This retrospective study presents the casuistry of patients 40 to 80 years old with adult degenerative scoliosis who underwent surgery in a referral institute from January 1994 to December 2013. Results: The prevalence was 0.087% (CI 95% 67.8-111), with a median age of 64.9 ± 9.4 years old, increased frequency in women and older adults. The prevalence of spondylolisthesis associated with degenerative scoliosis was 21%. The estimated risk for scoliosis in women was OR = 2.37 (CI 95% 1.35-4.15), while men showed OR = 0.4 (CI95% 0.24-0.73). The risk for spondylolisthesis associated to degenerative scoliosis was in men OR = 1.87. Conclusions: The prevalence in our experience is low and the sample age was higher; while gender, severity of the curve and presence of spondylolisthesis and olistesis were similar to the reviewed literature.

Resumen: Antecedentes: La escoliosis degenerativa del adulto es una deformidad rotacional tridimensional compleja, en una columna recta previamente, dando por resultado desequilibrio sagital y axial. Material y métodos: Este estudio retrospectivo presenta la casuística de los pacientes de 40 a 80 años de edad con escoliosis degenerativa del adulto que experimentaron la cirugía en un instituto de referencia desde enero de 1994 a diciembre de 2013. Resultados: La prevalencia fue de 0.087% (IC 95% 67.8-111), con una edad media de 64.9 ± 9.4 años, mayor frecuencia en mujeres y adultos mayores. La prevalencia de la espondilolistesis asociada a escoliosis degenerativa fue de 21%. El riesgo estimado para la escoliosis en las mujeres fue = 2.37 (IC 95% 1.35-4.15), mientras que los hombres mostraron OR = 0.4 (IC95% 0.24-0.73). El riesgo de espondilolistesis asociada a escoliosis degenerativa fue en hombres OR = 1.87. Conclusiones: La prevalencia en nuestra experiencia es baja y la edad de la muestra fue mayor; mientras que el género, la gravedad de la curva y la presencia de espondilolistesis y olistesis eran similares a la literatura consultada.

¿Es útil agregar una artrodesis intersomática a una artrodesis posterolateral en el tratamiento quirúrgico de la espondilolistesis lumbar degenerativa? / Does adding interbody fusion to posterolateral fusion increase success in the surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis?

INTRODUCCIÓN: Frecuentemente se agrega una artrodesis intersomática a la artrodesis posterolateral en el tratamiento quirúrgico de la espondilolistesis degenerativa. Sin embargo, la real utilidad de esta medida no está clara. MÉTODOS: Para responder esta pregunta utilizamos Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante búsquedas en múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, reanalizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Identificamos cuatro revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyen nueve estudios primarios, de los cuales ninguno corresponde a un ensayo aleatorizado. Concluimos que agregar una artrodesis intersomática a una artrodesis posterolateral en el tratamiento quirúrgico de la espondilolistesis degenerativa podría asociarse a una disminución en el deslizamiento del cuerpo vertebral y a una leve mejoría de la calidad de vida de los pacientes, pero asociado también a un mayor costo.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis usually involves an interbody fusion in addition to a posterolateral fusion. However, the value of this procedure has not been established. METHODS: To answer this question we used Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified four systematic reviews, including nine primary studies; none of them randomized. We concluded performing interbody fusion in addition to posterolateral fusion during the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis might decrease vertebral body slippage and lead to a slight improvement in quality of life. However, it is associated with higher costs.

Espondilolistesis traumática lumbosacra. reporte de cuatro casos y revisión de la bibliografía / Traumatic lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. report of four cases and literature review

En 1976, Wiltse y cols. clasificaron a las espondilolistesis en cinco tipos, según su etiología: displásica, ístmica, degenerativa, tumoral y traumática. Esta última es una de las más infrecuentes; hasta la fecha, se han publicado muy pocos casos. Las espondilolistesis traumáticas son lesiones poco frecuentes. Su causa suele estar relacionada con traumas de alta energía y es frecuente su asociación con lesiones de órganos abdominales, craneoencefálicos y tórax. La gran mayoría de estas lesiones son habitualmente de resolución quirúrgica por su alta inestabilidad. Se presentan cuatro pacientes operados en el último tiempo, con un seguimiento mínimo de 4 años, y una revisión actualizada de la literatura.

In 1976 Wiltse et al. described a spondylolisthesis classification in five types according to their etiology: dysplastic, isthmic, degenerative, tumoral and traumatic, the last one being the less common; there are very few reports in the literature. Traumatic spondylolisthesis is a very rare entity with few reports in the literature. It is usually associated with high energy trauma and abdominal, craneoencephalic and thoracic lesions should always be discarded. Most of these lesions should be resolved surgically due to its high mechanical instability. We report four cases with traumatic spondylolisthesis operated on during last years, with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. An update review is presented.

Functional disability, sagittal alignment and pelvic balance in lumbar spondylolisthesis / Incapacidade funcional, alinhamento sagital e equilíbrio pélvico em espondilolistese lombar / Discapacidad funcional, alineación sagital y balance pélvico en espondilolistesis lumbar

ABSTRACT Objectives: To demonstrate the recovery of lumbar sagittal pelvic alignment and sagittal pelvic balance after surgical reduction of lumbar spondylolisthesis and establish the benefits of the surgery for reduction and fixation of the lumbar spondylolisthesis with 360o circumferential arthrodesis for 2 surgical approaches by clinical and functional evaluation. Method: Eight patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis treated with surgical reduction and fixation of listhesis and segmental circumferential fusion with two surgical approaches were reviewed. They were evaluated before and after treatment with Oswestry, Visual Analogue for pain and Odom scales, performing radiographic measurement of lumbar sagittal alignment and pelvic sagittal balance with the technique of pelvic radius. Results: Oswestry scales and EVA reported improvement of symptoms after treatment in 8 cases; the Odom scale had six outstanding cases reported. The lumbar sagittal alignment presented a lumbosacral lordosis angle and a lumbopelvic lordosis angle reduced in 4 cases and increased in 4 other cases; pelvic sagittal balance increased the pelvic angle in 4 cases and decreased in 3 cases and the sacral translation of the hip axis to the promontory increased in 6 cases. Conclusion: The surgical procedure evaluated proved to be useful by modifying the lumbar sagittal alignment and the pelvic balance, besides reducing the symptoms, enabling the patient to have mobility and movement and the consequent satisfaction with the surgery.

RESUMO Objetivos: Demonstrar a recuperação do alinhamento pélvico sagital lombar e do equilíbrio pélvico sagital após a redução e fixação cirúrgica da espondilolistese lombar e estabelecer os benefícios do procedimento cirúrgico de redução e fixação da espondilolistese lombar com artrodese circunferencial 360° por dois acessos cirúrgicos por avaliação clínico-funcional. Método: Foram revisados 8 pacientes com espondilolistese lombar tratados com redução cirúrgica e fixação da listese e artrodese segmentar circunferencial por dois acessos cirúrgicos. Eles foram avaliados antes e após o tratamento pelas escalas de Oswestry, visual analógica para dor e de Odom, efetuando-se a medida radiográfica do alinhamento sagital lombar e do equilíbrio pélvico sagital com a técnica do raio pélvico. Resultados: As escalas de Oswestry e EVA relataram melhora dos sintomas após o tratamento em 8 casos, a escala de Odom teve 6 casos excelentes relatados. O alinhamento sagital lombar apresentou ângulo de lordose lombossacral e de lordose lombopélvica reduzidos em 4 casos e aumentados em 4 restantes; o equilíbrio sagital pélvico aumentou o ângulo pélvico em 4 casos e diminuiu em 3 casos e a translação sacral do eixo do quadril até o promontório aumentou em 6 casos. Conclusão: O procedimento cirúrgico avaliado comprova sua utilidade ao modificar o alinhamento sagital lombar e o equilíbrio pélvico e ao reduzir os sintomas, possibilitando que o paciente tenha mobilidade e movimento e a consequente satisfação com a cirurgia.

RESUMEN Objetivos: Demostrar la recuperación de la alineación sagital lumbar y del balance pélvico sagital tras la reducción quirúrgica de la espondilolistesis lumbar y establecer los beneficios del procedimiento quirúrgico de reducción y fijación de la espondilolistesis lumbar con artrodesis circunferencial de 360° por dos vías de abordaje mediante la evaluación clínico-funcional. Métodos: Se revisaron 8 pacientes con espondilolistesis lumbar tratados con reducción y fijación quirúrgica de la listesis y artrodesis circunferencial segmentaria por dos vías de abordaje. Se evaluaron antes y después del tratamiento con las escalas Oswestry, Visual Analógica del dolor y Odom, efectuando la medición radiográfica de la alineación sagital lumbar y del balance pélvico sagital con la técnica del radio pelviano. Resultados: Las escalas de Oswestry y EVA reportaron mejoría de la sintomatología después del tratamiento en los 8 casos; la escala Odom reporto 6 casos excelentes. La alineación sagital lumbar reportó los ángulos de lordosis lumbosacra y de lordosis lumbopélvica disminuidos en 4 casos y aumentados en 4 restantes; el balance pélvico sagital aumentó el ángulo pélvico en 4 casos y disminuyó en 3 casos; la traslación sacra del eje de las caderas al promontorio aumentó en 6 casos. Conclusión: El procedimiento quirúrgico evaluado demuestra su utilidad al modificar la alineación lumbar y el balance pélvico sagital y reducir la sintomatología, lo que permite la movilidad y el desplazamiento del paciente y la consecuente satisfacción con la cirugía.

Espondilolistesis degenerativa. Influencia del índice de masa corporal en la evolución postquirúrgica / Degenerative espondylolisthesis. Body mass index influence on the post-surgical evolution

Resumen: La espondilolistesis es el desplazamiento de un cuerpo vertebral en relación con el adyacente, el cual se clasifica en cuatro grados según Meyerding. Se incluyeron pacientes con espondilolistesis sometidos a manejo quirúrgico con instrumentación lumbar, mismos que se dividieron en dos grupos de acuerdo con su índice de masa corporal en obesos y no obesos. Se les aplicó un cuestionario Oswestry de capacidad funcional de forma prequirúrgica y al año de evolución se midió la correlación entre éste y el IMC. Se incluyeron 46 pacientes, 26 mujeres y 20 hombres de 2010 a 2013, con diagnóstico de espondilolistesis degenerativa con canal lumbar estrecho. La edad promedio fue de 58.9 años. El promedio del índice de discapacidad de Oswestry prequirúrgico en los pacientes no obesos fue 41% y en los pacientes obesos fue 47% con un año de seguimiento postquirúrgico con índice de discapacidad en no obesos de 12.30% y en obesos de 23.84%. El grupo de pacientes no obesos presentó una evolución clínica más favorable comparado con el grupo de pacientes con obesidad.

Abstract: Spondylolisthesis is the sliding of a vertebral body with respect to the adjacent one. According to the degree of slippage it is classified into 4 Meyerding grades. Patients with spondylolisthesis who underwent surgery with lumbar instrumentation were included. They were divided into two groups based on their body mass index: obese and non-obese. The functional capacity Oswestry score was calculated preoperatively and at one year, and it was correlated with the BMI. A total of 46 patients, 26 females and 20 males, were included, from 2010 to 2013, all of them with a diagnosis of degenerative spondylolisthesis with lumbar stenosis. Mean age was 58.9 years. The mean preoperative Oswestry disability index was 41% in non-obese patients and 47% in obese patients. At the one-year postoperative assessment the disability index was 12.30% in non-obese patients and 23.84% in obese patients. Non-obese patients had a more favorable clinical course compared to the group of obese patients.

Osteosintesis directa para tratar la espondilolistesis traumatica del axis. Reporte de un caso y revision bibliografica / Direct osteosynthesis to treat traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. Case report and literature review

La espondilolistesis traumática del axis representa un 5% de las fracturas cervicales y es definida por una fractura de la pars interarticularis de la segunda vértebra cervical. El mecanismo de esta fractura, en general, implica fuerzas de hiperextensión. Los aspectos más importantes relacionados con el pronóstico y tratamiento son el compromiso discal C2-C3, el compromiso neurológico y la presencia de luxación facetaria. En relación con los tratamientos conservador o quirúrgico en patrones no desplazados, la cirugía podría determinar una recuperación precoz. Por otro lado, se han descrito buenos resultados con el uso del halo chaleco. Se presenta un caso de espondilolistesis traumática del axis tratado con osteosíntesis directa a través de un abordaje posterior en un paciente que rechazó el tratamiento conservador.

Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis accounts for 5% of all cervical spine fractures and is defined as a pars interarticularis fracture in the second cervical vertebra. Its mechanism usually involves hyperextension forces. The most important aspects related to prognosis and treatment are C2-C3 disk injury, neurological involvement, facetary dislocation and displacement. As regards the conservative or surgical management in non-displaced patterns, surgical management could result in an early recovery; however, there are good results with halo vest immobilization. We present a case with C2 direct crew osteosynthesis through a posterior approach in a patient who refused conservative treatment.

Lumbar Lordosis of Spinal Stenosis Patients during Intraoperative Prone Positioning

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of spondylolisthesis on lumbar lordosis on the OSI (Jackson; Orthopaedic Systems Inc.) frame. Restoration of lumbar lordosis is important for maintaining sagittal balance. Physiologic lumbar lordosis has to be gained by intraoperative prone positioning with a hip extension and posterior instrumentation technique. There are some debates about changing lumbar lordosis on the OSI frame after an intraoperative prone position. We evaluated the effect of spondylolisthesis on lumbar lordosis after an intraoperative prone position. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients, who underwent spinal fusion at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery of Gwangmyeong Sungae Hospital between May 2007 and February 2012, were included in this study. The study compared lumbar lordosis on preoperative upright, intraoperative prone and postoperative upright lateral X-rays between the simple stenosis (SS) group and spondylolisthesis group. The average age of patients was 67.86 years old. The average preoperative lordosis was 43.5degrees (+/- 14.9degrees), average intraoperative lordosis was 48.8degrees (+/- 13.2degrees), average postoperative lordosis was 46.5degrees (+/- 16.1degrees) and the average change on the frame was 5.3degrees (+/- 10.6degrees). RESULTS: Among all patients, 24 patients were diagnosed with simple spinal stenosis, 43 patients with spondylolisthesis (29 degenerative spondylolisthesis and 14 isthmic spondylolisthesis). Between the SS group and spondylolisthesis group, preoperative lordosis, intraoperative lordosis and postoperative lordosis were significantly larger in the spondylolisthesis group. The ratio of patients with increased lordosis on the OSI frame compared to preoperative lordosis was significantly higher in the spondylolisthesis group. The risk of increased lordosis on frame was significantly higher in the spondylolisthesis group (odds ratio, 3.325; 95% confidence interval, 1.101 to 10.039; p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative lumbar lordosis on the OSI frame with a prone position was larger in the SS patients than the spondylolisthesis patients, which also produced a larger postoperative lordosis angle after posterior spinal fusion surgery. An increase in lumbar lordosis on the OSI frame should be considered during posterior spinal fusion surgery, especially in spondylolisthesis patients.

High degree spondylolisthesis in adults: monosegmental reduction and fixation / Espondilolistese de alto grau em adultos: redução e fixação monossegmentar / Espondilolistesis de alto grado en adultos: reducción y fijación monosegmentaria

ABSTRACT. Objective: To evaluate a method to reduce high degree spondylolisthesis in adults with monosegmental fixing preserving the adjacent level and the improvement of sagittal balance. METHODS: A prospective study, with 12 adult patients with high degree spondylolisthesis (III and IV) in adults who underwent surgery by the same team. We included 7 women and 5 men with a mean age of 37 years and lombosciatalgy that had no improvement with conservative treatment. The surgical technique used was total or partial reduction by Spondylolisthesis Reduction Instrument (SRI) system, with instrumentation only in the affected level, thus sparing the adjacent level, associated with 360ofusion. RESULTS: The L5-S1 level was involved in nine patients, L4-L5 in two, and VT-S1 in one patient. The isthmic type predominated in nine patients, followed by dysplastic type in two, and one iatrogenic spondylolisthesis. These patients were assessed by the Oswestry scale, which showed a preoperative average of 59% and postoperative average of 12.4% (P<0.05). A significant improvement in the average slip angle from 54.66% to 9.5% (35% to 0%) was found. No major complications such as infection, neurological damage or material breaks were observed. CONCLUSION: The reduction of high degree listhesis instrumenting only the affected level produces good results, with good control of pain and functional improvement of patients. However, a larger follow-up is required to better evaluation.

RESUMO. Objetivo: Avaliar um método de redução de espondilolistese de alto grau em adultos com fixação monossegmentar, preservando o nível adjacente e a melhora do equilíbrio sagital. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados prospectivamente 12 pacientes adultos portadores de espondilolistese de alto grau (III e IV), submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico pela mesma equipe. Foram incluídos 7 mulheres e 5 homens, com média de idade de 37 anos e quadro de lombociatalgia sem melhora com o tratamento conservador. A técnica cirúrgica utilizada foi redução total ou parcial pelo sistema Spondylolisthesis Reduction Instrument (SRI), instrumentando-se somente o nível acometido e poupando, assim, o nível adjacente, associado à artrodese 360º. RESULTADOS: Em nove pacientes o nível L5-S1 foi acometido, L4-L5 em dois pacientes e VT-S1 em um paciente. O tipo ístmico predominou em nove pacientes, o displásico em dois e listese iatrogênica em um paciente. Os pacientes foram avaliados por meio da escala de Oswestry, que mostrou média pré-operatória de 59% e pós-operatória de 12,4% (P < 0,05). Houve melhora significativa do ângulo de escorregamento médio de 54,66% para 9,5% (35% a 0%). Não houve complicações como infecção, lesão neurológica ou quebra de material. CONCLUSÃO: O método de redução da listese de alto grau, instrumentando-se somente o nível acometido, traz bons resultados, com controle do quadro álgico e melhora funcional dos pacientes, porém necessita de um follow-up maior para melhor avaliação.

RESUMEN. Objetivo: Evaluar un método de reducción de la espondilolistesis de alto grado en adultos con la fijación monosegmentaria, preservando el nivel adyacente y la mejoría del equilibrio sagital. MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo de 12 pacientes adultos con espondilolistesis de alto grado (III y IV) sometidos a cirugía por el mismo equipo. Se incluyeron 7 mujeres y 5 hombres con una edad media de 37 años con dolor lumbar sin mejora con el tratamiento conservador. La técnica quirúrgica empleada fue la reducción total o parcial por el sistema Spondylolisthesis Reduction Instrument (SRI), realizando instrumentación sólo en el nivel afectado, conservando los niveles adyacentes, asociados a la artrodesis 360o. RESULTADOS: En nueve pacientes, el nivel L5-S1 estuvo involucrado, L4-L5 en dos casos y un caso de VT-S1. El tipo ístmico predominó en nueve pacientes, seguido de displasia en dos casos y un caso de listesis iatrogénica. Estos pacientes fueron evaluados utilizando la escala de Oswestry, que mostró un promedio preoperatorio y posoperatorio del 59% al 12,4% (P < 0,05). Hubo una mejoría significativa en el ángulo de deslizamiento promedio de 54,66% a 9,5% (35% a 0%). No hubo complicaciones como infecciones, daño neurológico o quiebre de material. CONCLUSIÓN: El método para reducir listesis de alto grado con instrumentación solamente del nivel afectado, trae buenos resultados, con el control del dolor y mejoría funcional de los pacientes; sin embargo, se requiere un seguimiento más largo para que se obtenga una mejor evaluación.